Stage 1 · Scope
One phase at a time, in writing.
Four services, all tested with the tools disabled users actually use.
Retrofitting accessibility costs several times what building it in costs, because the problems are usually structural: heading order, focus management, form labels, colour contrast chosen at design stage. We build with those settled early, and the repository and deployment configuration transfer to you on payment.
One phase at a time, in writing.
Contrast and structure settled early.
Tested as we go, not at the end.
Repository and documentation to you.
Key journeys, not a random sample.
To clear the obvious.
Keyboard and screen reader.
By impact on completing a task.
Automated scanners catch a minority of real barriers. The ones that stop people using a site — a form you cannot complete with a keyboard, a modal that traps focus, an image carousel that announces nothing — are found by a person testing with the tools disabled users actually use. Our report lists failures against specific criteria, ranked by the impact on someone trying to complete a task.
Public sector bodies must publish an accessibility statement that is accurate — one claiming full compliance on a site with known failures is worse than one listing them honestly with a plan. We fix what can be fixed, retest, and draft a statement that reflects reality, including the parts not yet resolved.
Blocking issues before cosmetic ones.
In the code, not with an overlay.
With the same assistive tools.
Drafted honestly, including gaps.
So another team could take over.
The few habits that matter most.
A short routine before publishing.
Retain us, or take it in house.
Most sites regress because content editors add an unlabelled image or paste a heading that breaks the order. A short session on the handful of habits that matter does more for long-term accessibility than another audit, and it means you can leave us whenever you want.
A free first call, including an honest answer about whether you need an audit yet.